Typical scenarios of PBB VPLS are classified into the following types:
Fully meshed PBB VPLS
On the HVPLS network shown in Figure 1, PBB VPLS uses the MAC-in-MAC technique instead of the QinQ technique to decrease the number of MAC address entries that SPEs must learn, improving network expansibility.
PBB VPLS with an E-Trunk determining the master/backup NPE status
On the network shown in Figure 2, UPE1 is dual-homed to two SPEs, and each SPE is dual-homed to two NPEs. An E-Trunk determines the master/backup NPE status. If SPE1 provides access for CE3, PBB VPLS can then enable CE1 to communicate with CE2 and CE3.
Local PBB VPLS
On the network shown in Figure 4, CE1 is dual-homed to two UPEs, and CE1 connects to CE2 through UPE2. An E-Trunk is configured between UPE1 and UPE2 to determine the master/backup UPE status. Normally, UPE1 is the master device and UPE2 is the backup device, and CE1 communicates with CE2 through UPE1 over a remote PBB VPLS connection. If the link between CE1 and UPE1 fails or UPE1 fails, CE1 communicates with CE2 through UPE2 over a local PBB VPLS connection.
In local PBB VPLS, two I-VSIs are bound to the same B-VSI and assigned the same I-tag. One I-VSI's B-DMAC address is the same as the other I-VSI's B-SMAC address.