Table 1 describes the differences between LDP VPWS and BGP/MPLS IP VPN.
Item |
LDP VPWS |
BGP/MPLS IP VPN |
---|---|---|
Cost of PEs |
The memory cost is low; the consumption of interface resources is high; the signaling cost is high. |
The memory cost is high; the consumption of interface resources is low; the signaling cost is low. |
Flooding mode of the VPN topology |
Manual configuration. |
BGP automatic discovery. |
Flooding mode of VPN routes |
The VPN routes are flooded directly between CEs and converge rapidly. |
The VPN routes are flooded by PEs and converge slowly. |
Access mode of CEs |
CEs with different link encapsulation types can interwork over a heterogeneous LDP VPWS network. |
Different sites in the same VPN can have different access modes. |
VPN nesting |
Not supported. |
Supported. |
Support for multicast |
The protocol cost is low; the forwarding cost is high. |
The protocol cost is high; the forwarding cost is low. |
Protocol independence |
Over any Layer 3 protocol. |
Over only IP. |
Variety of tunnels |
LSPs tunnels are supported. |
LSPs and IPsec tunnels are supported. |
Inheritance from the traditional VPN |
Inherits and improves the traditional L2VPN. |
Inherits and improves the traditional L2VPN. |
Maturity |
Immature. |
Mature. |
Easy-of-use |
Complex. |
Simple. |
Manageability |
Outsourced topology and centralized management. |
Outsourced route and role-based management. |